Cases 41 - 50 of 331
Frith v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Rodney Vance Frith
Defendant:
Harold Walter Clarke, Kyle and Dr. Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 7:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Frank E. Reid
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, J. Bledsoe, Dr. Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumumba v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Askari Danso M.S. Lumumba
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Joseph W. Walters, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Wynne et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Bank of the James Financial Group Inc., John Wynne, James Wynne and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal VL Rivers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Matthias v. Ean Holdings, LLC
as 2:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Walter Matthias
Defendant:
EAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury/ Motor Vehicle
Madison v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Walter Madison
Defendant:
Ford, Ms. Dunning and Mrs. Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Fuller et al
as 7:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Jenkins
Defendant:
A. Fuller and D. Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wareka v. Island Glow, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka
Defendant:
Island Glow, LLC and Michelle Walters
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Tyler, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, H. Scott Richeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
