Cases 581 - 590 of 78,448
Simpson v. Mineral Fusion Natural Brands, LLC
as 1:2024cv02332
Defendant:
Mineral Fusion Natural Brands, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Shenzhen Vakye Technology Co., Ltd v. Nagaria et al
as 8:2024cv02322
Defendant:
Fozia Nagaria, Mohammed Yousef Nagaria and Mohammed Yousef Nagaria and Fozia Nagaria Trust
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Vakye Technology Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Gibson v. Haines
as 1:2024cv02331
Plaintiff:
Vance Gibson
Defendant:
Avril Haines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
Black v. Jones et al
as 8:2024cv02337
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ron DeSantis, Marcus Jordan Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2024cv02342
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02338
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
