Cases 61 - 70 of 180
Perez v. Cumberland County Clerk of Court
as 5:2018hc02204
Respondent:
Cumberland County Clerk of Court
Petitioner:
Ulysses W. Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879 et al
as 5:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
3.83 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0474-95-0551 Identified in Deed of Correction Recorded in Book 3646 Page 879, Andrew David Horne, Ronald Wayne Ruple and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018hc02137
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
North Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Phillip E. Berger et al
as 5:2018cv00176
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Defendant:
Phillip E. Berger, Timothy K. Moore, The State of North Carolina and others
Movant:
Dallas Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
v. North Carolina Democratic Party et al
as 5:2018cv00175
Defendant:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
North Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Phillip E. Berger et al
as 5:2018mc00009
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Democratic Party, Cumberland County Democratic Party, Durham County Democratic Party and others
Defendant:
Phillip E. Berger, Timothy K. Moore, The State of North Carolina and others
Movant:
Dallas Woodhouse
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.51 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0450-29-4949 Identified as Exhibit A in Book 9014, Page 627 et al
as 5:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.51 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0450-29-4949 Identified as Exhibit A in Book 9014, Page 627 , Philip W. Haigh, III and James C. MacRae, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.47 Acre, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0473-92-2852, Described as That Certain Tract Containing 117.3 Acres in That Certain Deed et al
as 5:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.47 Acre, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, Located on Parcel Identification No. 0473-92-2852, Described as That Certain Tract Containing 117.3 Acres in That Certain Deed, Rupert E. Tatum, Jr. and Eleanor W. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 1.17 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, located on Parcel Identification No. 0593-92-5939 et al
as 5:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.17 Acres, More or Less, in Cumberland County, North Carolina, located on Parcel Identification No. 0593-92-5939, Edward L. Murphy, Barbara M. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
NC Democratic Party v. Phillip Berger
as 18-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DURHAM COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BIPARTISAN STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS ENFORCEMENT and KIMBERLY STRACH, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Bipartisan State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
