Cases 81 - 90 of 172
Rojas-Vargas et al v. Cindell Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02207
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Rojas-Vargas , Luis Garcia-Millan and Jorge Chica-Marquez
Defendant:
Cindell Construction Company, Inc. and S. Barber & Son, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Luis Ischiu v. Gomez Garcia
as 8:2017cv01269
Plaintiff:
Wiliam Estuardo Luis Ischiu
Defendant:
Nely Del Rosario Gomez Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603
Adams v. Stuehmeier et al
as 1:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Bryan Anthony Adams
Defendant:
Stuehmeier and Caleb Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia Eguizabal v. Hu and Tan, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Clara Garcia Eguizabal
Defendant:
Hu and Tan, Inc. , Dan Feng Hu and Guo Zhi Ye
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Argueta Rivas et al v. Global Services & Systems, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Moises Javier Argueta Rivas , Cruz Antonio Garcia Benitez and Nelson Nakun Rodriguez Reyes
Defendant:
Global Services & Systems, Inc. , Jennifer Kim and Peter Kim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Beyer v. Salasidis et al
as 1:2016cv03558
Plaintiff:
David Beyer
Defendant:
Anastase Salasidis , Edward Garcia and Sun Duck Lee
Cross_claimant:
Edward Garcia
Cross_defendant:
Anastase Salasidis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia Paredes et al v. Global Home Company, Inc.
as 8:2016cv03521
Plaintiff:
Elmer Ademir Garcias Paredes and Wilson Leonel Garcia Paredes
Defendant:
Global Home Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv03189
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez Garcia
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fuertes v. USA-2255
as 1:2016cv02862
Petitioner:
Kevin Garcia Fuertes
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garcia-Perez v. United States
as 1:2016cv02771
Plaintiff:
Edgar Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
