Cases 81 - 90 of 111
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, K F McDonald, H M Herlong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Wilson et al
as 6:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
A Wilson, H B Richardson, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. McKie et al
as 6:2013cv01976
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
B McKie, W Byars, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01975
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 6:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
W Nettles, R Carter, J Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 6:2013cv01247
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
R B Harwell, NFN Florian, K E Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01001
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01002
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rochester v. Davis et al
as 6:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Helen Davis, Chris Florian, R B Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rochester v. Florian et al
as 6:2013cv00532
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Chris Florian, Larry Cartledge, Helen Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
