Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Thorpe v. Hillman et al
as 7:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Corey B. Thorpe
Defendant:
Hillman, O'Brien and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sanders v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2009cv00026
Petitioner:
Roosevelt C. Sanders
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McCrae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2008cv00576
Petitioner:
Travis McCrae
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Moody v. DeJesus et al
as 7:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Charles Moody
Defendant:
Daniel DeJesus, David Allred, David Roff and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brillhart et al v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2008cv00686
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Brillhart and Gary L. Smith
Defendant:
Patricia R. Stansberry, K. M. White, Unknown Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2008cv00388
Plaintiff:
James D. Roberts
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, Wilson, Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Roberts v. O'Brien et al
as 7:2008cv00389
Petitioner:
James D Roberts
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flanigan v. Panaguiten et al
as 2:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Flanigan
Defendant:
Elizabeth Panaguiten, J. D. Allen, Vanessa Adams and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brooks v. N.N. Va. Police Dept. et al
as 1:2008cv00439
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Brooks
Respondent:
N.N. Va. Police Dept., City Of N.N. Va., Justice Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. N.N. Va. Police Dept. et al
as 2:2008cv00257
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Brooks
Respondent:
N.N. Va. Police Dept., City Of N.N. Va., Justice Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
