Cases 81 - 90 of 316
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Faulkner v. Weber
as 1:2021cv02779
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crosby v. Weber
as 1:2021cv02742
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Crosby, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario et al v. MAL Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessa Hinton, Kim Cozzens, Hillary hepner and others
Defendant:
MAL Entertainment, Inc., BLL Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Crazy Horse, David Baucom and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Fortune v. Western Correction Institution et al
as 1:2021cv02782
Plaintiff:
James Lee Fortune, Jr.
Defendant:
Western Correction Institution, Warden Ronald Weber and Ms. J. G. Sindy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bush v. Mr. Weber
as 1:2021cv02305
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Bush
Respondent:
Mr. Weber, Ronald S. Weber and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bostick v. Weber
as 1:2021cv02507
Petitioner:
Ronnie Junior Bostick
Respondent:
Warden Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leupolu v. Dr. Okoluku et al
as 1:2021cv01854
Plaintiff:
Phillip Leupolu
Defendant:
Dr. Okoluku, Administrator Jamillah Nock and Warden R Shane Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelly v. Acting Warden Ronald Shane Weber et al
as 1:2021cv02351
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Kelley and Keith Darnell Kelly
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Shane Weber, Acting Asst. Warden Bradley O. Butler, Acting Security Chief Keith Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Aurel v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02182
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Rich Hallworth, The Corporation Trust Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
