Cases 1 - 10 of 232
Meyers v. VA DOC et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
VA DOC, Kyle Rosch, Mack Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jennings
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bell v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bailey, Williams and Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 6:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Bailey
Defendant:
Group Long Term Disability Insurance Plan for Employees of Centra Health, Inc. and Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Craig Bailey
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
