Cases 1 - 10 of 141,287
Mey v. CHW Group Inc.
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
CHW Group Inc. doing business as Choice Home Warranty
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Prevatte v. Country Time Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Defendant:
Virgil Zook and Country Time Trucking, LLC
Plaintiff:
Misty Prevatte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Williams v. Baker
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Gavin Williams
Defendant:
Sergeant Kevin Baker
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00146
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mey v. Racquet War LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
Songwhale LLC and Racquet War LLC a Tennessee Limited Liability Company doing business as Paddle War
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Flint v. Starr et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Defendant:
Medical Memes, Medical Dept. H.S.A. Boch, USP Hazelton Medical Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Louis Flint, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael v. Asbury et al
as 5:2024cv00210
Defendant:
Captain Sams, CO Macunas, CO James Asbury and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Warden, FCI McDowell
as 1:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Aldo Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00637
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Brianna Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
