Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rogers v. Proctor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff: Tyrone Rogers
Defendant: Dr. David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daye v. Proctor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00227
Plaintiff: Cornell F. Daye
Defendant: David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher v. Hoke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03714
Petitioner: William David Belcher
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Plumley
as 2:2012cv01309
Petitioner: Steven A. Watkins
Respondent: Jim Rubenstein and Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Hoke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00892
Petitioner: Timothy Jared Austin
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Proctor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00159
Plaintiff: Donald Lee Taylor
Defendant: David Proctor, Tristan Tenney, Wexford Medical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Hoke
as 2:2011cv00095
Petitioner: Timothy Jared Austin
Respondent: Adrian Hoke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Messer v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2011cv00079
Plaintiff: Raymond Charles Messer
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke and Debbie Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2011cv00159
Plaintiff: Arthur Allen
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, Adrian Hoke, William Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slie v. Hoke et al
as 5:2011cv00121
Petitioner: Robert Slie
Respondent: Adrian Hoke and Mark A. Karl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?