Cases 1 - 6 of 6
LREP Arizona, LLC v. 597 Broadway Realty LP et al
as 1:2020mc00475
Defendant:
Unknown Lee, Shui Yee Lee, Unknown Siddique and others
Plaintiff:
LREP Arizona, LLC
Garnishee:
Glendorn Capital Management LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Charles Schwab & Company Incorporated and others
Rose Duru v. President Trump Administration
as 19-2134
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Marietta, Georgia, H&R BLOCK BAILEY'S CROSSROADS CENTER, DAVID R. CLOUSTON, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Capital Finance, LLC v. Oscar Rosenberg
as 19-1202
Defendant / Appellant:
OSCAR ROSENBERG and JOSEF NEUMAN
Garnishee:
TD BANK, N.A., JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., FIDELITY CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
Continental Casualty Company v. Battery Wealth, Incorporated
as 11-1600
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
BATTERY WEALTH, INCORPORATED and WAYNE CASSADAY
Intervenor/Defendant:
MALCOLM CROSLAND, MEGGETT B. LAVIN, THOMAS S. WHITE and others
Intervenor:
DAVID T. PEARLMAN and JANET PEARLMAN
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
CAROL M. GRAF, Individually and as assignee of T Alexander Beard, CHARLES W. WOOLEN and PAMELA WOOLEN
SEC v. Leonard Forrest
as 10-1284
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - None:
ALBERT E. PARISH, JR., PARISH ECONOMICS LLC and SUMMERVILLE HARD ASSETS LLC
Creditor - None:
BANK OF AMERICA NA
Intervenor - Appellant:
LEONARD FORREST
Party-in-Interest - Appellee:
S GREGORY HAYS, RECEIVER
Party-in-Interest - None:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, BATTERY WEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC, BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Charles Schwab & Company, Inco v. Richard Brown
as 09-320
Petitioner:
CHARLES SCHWAB & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN, LOUIS C. MANCUSO, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and ROBERT J. BRINSON
:
and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
