Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Riddick v. Rose et al
as 7:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Rose, C/O T. Neece, C/O H. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul-Hamza Muhammad v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 16-6208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-HAMZA WALI MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, HAROLD W. CLARKE, DEBRA D. GARDNER and others
Kelvin Canada v. Walter Davi
as 13-6193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN A. CANADA
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WALTER DAVIS, SGT. WILLIAM WRIGHT, SGT. PAUL PAYNE and others
Defendant:
HEAD NURSE VICKI PHIPPS, DR. TIMOTHY MCBRIDE and NURSE M. SCOTT
Canada v. Davis et al
as 7:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Defendant:
Officer Walter Davis, Dr. Timothy McBride, Sgt. Paul Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Clarke et al
as 7:2011cv00408
Defendant:
Nurse Practioner Deborah Ball, C/O Grant Bledsoe, Lt. Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00369
Defendant:
D. Ball, Grant Bledsoe, Blevins and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A. Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Johnson v. V. Phipps
as 09-8025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
V. PHIPPS, Nursing Director, ROSP, J. KISER, Captain Prison Guard, RSOP, DEWAYNE TURNER, Prison Guard Lieutenant, ROSP and others
Kevin Johnson v. V. Phipps
as 09-6647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
V. PHIPPS, Nursing Director, Red Onion State Prison, J. KISER, Captain Prison Guard, Red Onion State Prison, DEWAYNE TURNER, Prison Guard, Lieutenant, Red Onion State Prison and others
Defendant - None:
MARK R. WARNER, Former Governor of Virginia, RONALD J. ANGELONE, Virginia Department of Corrections, GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
