Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Inman v. Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Petitioner:
James Robert Inman
Respondent:
Designation and Sentence Computation Center (DSCC) and Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells et al v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 1:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Inman, Arlen Glenn Wells, Jr. and Ruth H. Wells
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Inman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12667
Plaintiff:
Jill Inman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv06625
Plaintiff:
Janis Inman and Wyndell Inman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09797
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Inman and Richard Inman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07517
Plaintiff:
Mary Inman and Christopher Inman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Inman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Cindy Carlson Inman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inman v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30712
Plaintiff:
Shirley Inman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
