Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Janet Hodgin v. UTC Fire & Security America
as 17-1222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDITH BOWLER, JANET HODGIN, MICHAEL HODGIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. HOUGH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, KERRY O'SHEA, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, GEORGE CAIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORP., INC., ALLIANCE SECURITY, INC., d/b/a AH Security, Inc, formerly doing business as Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc., d/b/a VMS Alarms and others
Defendant:
VERSATILE MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a VMS Alarms, d/b/a VMS Alliance Security, d/b/a Alliance Home Protection, LISA HADDAD, d/b/a CCA Services LLC, d/b/a Alarmillinois.com, d/b/a Alarmindiana.com, DOES 1-10 and others
Party-in-Interest:
COMPLIANCEPOINT, INC.
Monitronics International, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
as 1:2013md02493
Plaintiff:
Edith Bowler , Janet Hodgin , Michael Hodgin and others
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc. , Versatile Marketing Solutions, Inc. , UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowler et al v. Monitronics International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Edith Bowler , Janet Hodgin , Michael Hodgin and others
Defendant:
Monitronics International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashcraft, et al v. Conoco, Inc., et al
as 7:1995cv00187
Plaintiff:
Hurshel L. Ashcraft , All Plaintiffs , Frances L. Ashcraft and others
Defendant:
Conoco, Inc. , Kayo Oil Company and Triangle Facilities, Inc.
Movant:
United States of America , J. Harold Seagle, George Rountree, III and others
Respondent:
Kirsten B. Mitchell , Cory Reiss and Wilmington Morning Star
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
