Cases 1 - 10 of 30
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7262
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-7246
Defendant / Appellee:
I. O. RIVERO, I. O. HARRIS, J. ELY and others
Defendant:
JULIA C. DUDLEY, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Stewart v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv01761
Petitioner:
Robert Stewart
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 20-6625
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Carl Manis
as 19-7849
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DANIELS, J. ELY, A. W. COMBS and others
Defendant:
JAMES JONES, PAMELA MEADE SARGENT, ROBERT STEWART BALLOU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. James Jones
as 19-6962
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROBERT STEWART BALLOU, RED ONION STATE PRISON EMPLOYEES, U.S. JUDGE GLEN E. CONRAD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6926
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN REGIONAL PREA ANALYST, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Jeffrey Kiser
as 19-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
FISCAL TECH, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. M. Counts
as 19-6519
Defendant / Appellee:
W. SWINEY, MARCUS ELAM, J. KISER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Jeffrey Kiser
as 19-6487
Defendant / Appellee:
FISCAL TECH, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
