Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas Tully v. Gene Johnson
as 22-6362
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS M. TULLY
Respondent / Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Thomas Tully v. Harold Clarke
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-7329
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS M. TULLY
Tully v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Tully
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Cynthia D. Kinser, Court of Appeals of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Thomas Tully v. Gene Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-6864
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS M. TULLY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Thomas Tully v. Gene Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-6362
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS M. TULLY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Tully v. USA
as 5:2011cv80314
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Tully
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tully v. Johnson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv00299
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Tully
Respondent:
Gene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.