Cases 101 - 110 of 7,441
Pacheco-Morales v. Collier
as 24-40050
Plaintiff:
Hector Pacheco-Morales
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional Institutions Division, Don Briscoe, FNU Norsworthy, Senior Warden and others
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20040
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Krieg v. Blake
as 24-40048
Plaintiff:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant:
James E. Blake, Chibuike M. Omwuka, Fernater J. Smith and others
Oden v. Lumpkin
as 24-40044
Petitioner:
John David Oden
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Enriquez v. DHS Immigration
as 24-20035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration Department, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and others
Ellison v. Lumpkin
as 24-10054
Petitioner:
Jacob Douglas Ellison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20024
Petitioner:
Traelyn Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner:
Bartholomew Granger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 24-40022
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Laura Haney
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40018
Petitioner:
Joshua Wiley Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
