Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McGee v. Barton
as 24-30038
Plaintiff:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
McGee v. Barton
as 23-30458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
Williams v. Nettles
as 23-30347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe Nettles, Warden, Mark LaPrairie, Warden, John Doe Jack, Major and others
Edwards v. Rheems
as 23-30109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Luke Rheems, Colonel, Nettle, Warden, Simon, Colonel and others
Clarance Nettles v. Jimmie Bunch
as 10-60755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARANCE E. NETTLES
Defendant - Appellee:
JIMMIE BUNCH, Police Chief
Milton Nettles v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-50662
Petitioner - Appellant:
MILTON WAYNE NETTLES
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Thomas v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-20812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO ESTABON THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, STEVE MILLER, JANICE HERNANDEZ and others
Dixon v. LA Dept of Corr, et al
as 08-30141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHEL J DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD STALDER, RICHWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Sylvester v. Cain, et al
as 07-30790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY J SYLVESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, NOBTS/SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION, DONALD BARR and others
Parker v. Cain, et al
as 06-31269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KERMIT PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NETTLES, N BURL CAIN, LINDA MILLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
