Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Cases 91 - 100 of 8,786
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40018
Petitioner: Joshua Wiley Mitchell
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Granger v. Lumpkin
as 24-70001
Petitioner: Bartholomew Granger
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
In re: Ivan Cantu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-40110
Petitioner: In re: Ivan Abner Cantu
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 23-11267
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Adam Gonzalez
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 24-40022
Petitioner: Michael E. Geiger
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Laura Haney
Rice v. Lumpkin
as 24-10071
Petitioner: Reginald Donell Rice
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Watts v. Lumpkin
as 24-20004
Petitioner: Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20024
Petitioner: Traelyn Smith
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Crider v. Lumpkin
as 23-50918
Petitioner: Robert Lee Crider
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10087
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, res

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?