Cases 11 - 20 of 162
Keaton v. Garland
as 22-20542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Wayne Keaton and Brad Wayne Keaton
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Dickson v. Garland
as 22-60503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bryan K. Dickson
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, William Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Colette S. Peters, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Looper v. Jones
as 22-40579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delores Looper
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas B. Jones, Federal Bureau of Prisons and 6 Unknown Employees
Ellis v. USA
as 22-10729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Michael Caravajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Bush v. Watson
as 22-40418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. Watson, Unit Personnel Hansen, Lieutenant, Unit Personnel Maze and others
Banks v. Fed Bureau of Prisons
as 22-30349
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Respondent / Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Sekou Ma'at
Orr v. USA
as 22-30300
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Ellis v. USA
as 21-10999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla A. Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Michael Caravajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Ellis-Erkkila v. USA
as 21-50828
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Matthews v. Exct Ofc US Atty
as 21-50829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Martin Matthews
Defendant / Appellee:
Executive Office of United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Legal Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
