Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Akili Amen-Ra v. Don Williams, et al
as 14-41188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKILI S. AMEN-RA, formerly known as Johnnie Tasby
Defendant - Appellee:
DON WILLIAMS, U.S. Probation Officer, GUY JONES, Judge, RODNEY MCDANIEL, Assistant District Attorney and others
Denis Agbor v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60601
Petitioner:
DENIS AGBOR AGBOR, also known as Alfonso T. McDaniel, also known as Gene Edwards
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Andre McDaniel
as 14-20475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE MCDANIELS, also known as Dre
Robert McDaniel v. Momentive Specialty Chem, Inc., et al
as 14-20462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MOMENTIVE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED and OILFIELD TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INCORPORATED
Robert McDaniel v. Momentive Specialty Chem, Inc., et al
as 14-20410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT R. MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MOMENTIVE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED and OILFIELD TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INCORPORATED
USA v. James McDaniel
as 13-11217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MCDANIEL
USA v. Andre McDaniel
as 13-20376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE MCDANIELS
USA v. Richard McDaniel
as 13-10397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD REED MCDANIEL
Thomas McDaniel v. Terex Reedrill
as 13-30218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
TEREX USA, L.L.C., doing business as Terex Drills, formerly known as Terex Reedrill
James McDaniel v. Jeffrey Lyon, et al
as 13-50122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CASEY MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY T. LYON, Sheriff, Hill County Sheriff's Office, LARRY ARMSTRONG, Captain, Hill County Sheriff's Office, JOHN K. MILBURN, Justice Magistrate, 66th Judicial District Court and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
