Cases 31 - 40 of 676
Leita v. Lumpkin
as 23-40283
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerome Lewis Leita
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mock v. Garland
as 23-10319
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William T. Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition, Incorporated, a nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Texas, Brady Brown, Gun Owners of America, Incorporated and others
USA v. Lewis
as 23-30362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Paul Anthony Lewis
USA v. Meals
as 23-10554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Lewis Meals, Jr.
USA v. Lewis
as 23-10506
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Felton Eugene Lewis, also known as Gene Lewis, also known as Oldon Young, also known as Oguy Donor Nyou, also known as John Thick
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Inocencio
as 23-20098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shanetta Guidry Lewis
Defendant / Appellant:
Devin Inocencio, Victor Villarreal, Peter Carroll and others
Jarvis v. Vergara
as 23-60170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee:
Raphael Vergara, Warden, Unknown Wilkinson, Warden, Unknown Kessler, Warden and others
Lewis v. Bickham
as 23-30086
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lerone Lewis
Respondent / Appellee:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
