Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Arturo Prado v. Cindy Huggins, et al
as 16-50223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTURO PRADO
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDY HUGGINS, CSR No. #2739, the official Court Reporter for the 216th Judicial District Court for Gillespie County, Texas, CLAY STEADMAN, Attorney at Law, MICHELLE L. HENRICKS, Director, Court Reporters Certification Board, in her official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-30165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deborah Alverson v. Harrison County, Mississippi, et al
as 15-60365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH K. ALVERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, By and Through its Board of Supervisors, MELVIN BRISOLARA, Harrison County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity and CINDY GRIFFITH, Animal Control Officer and Deputy Sheriff, Badge No. 422 in her official and individual capacity
Marvinell Harlan, et al v. Standard Fire Insurance Co, et al
as 14-20391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVINELL HARLAN and GREGORY HARLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DEAN AND DRAPER INSURANCE AGENCY, L.P., ROBERT DEAN and others
Renode Collins v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 13-31232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENODE COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, in his individual and official capacities as Secretary of Corrections, BURL CAIN, in his individual and official capacities as Warden, RICHARD PEABODY, in his individual and official capacities as Deputy Warden and others
Hancock County Board of Supr, et al v. Karen Ruhr, et al
as 13-60614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZLEHURST, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, NANETTE THURMOND-SMITH, PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Movant - Appellant:
PAMELA JEFFERSON, GREGORY PARTMAN, LASTER SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, COPIAH COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
JIM HOOD
Robert Sharpe, et al v. AmeriPlan Corporation, et al
as 13-10922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JOHN SHARPE, for themselves as individuals and on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated, CINDY GUARISCO, for themselves as individuals and on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated, WILLIAM CHASE MOEN, for themselves as individuals and on behalf of themselves and for all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERIPLAN CORPORATION, a Texas Corporation, DENNIS BLOOM, an individual, DANIEL BLOOM, an individual and others
George Neely, et al v. J.M. Trippon & Company, et al
as 13-20434
Debtor:
In the Matter of: GEORGE R. NEELY
Appellant:
GEORGE R. NEELY and CINDY NEELY
Appellee:
J.M. TRIPPON & COMPANY, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, INCORPORATED and JAMES M. TRIPPON
Emmanuel Akpan v. Dept of Health and Human Svc, et al
as 13-10445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL UKO AKPAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Office of Inspector General, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, CAROLYN COZAD HUGHES, Individually and in her official capacity as Administrative Law Judge - DHHS/OIG and others
Jeffrey Snarke v. Cindy Barkley, et al
as 13-10404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY GIUTTARI SNARKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDY BARKLEY, Department of Public Safety Trooper, in Her Individual and Official Capacity, HEATH PRATER, Department of Public Safety, in His Individual and Official Capacity, DON L. JOHNSON, Department of Public Safety, Trooper, in His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
