Cases 81 - 90 of 1,189
Scott v. Haynes
as 23-50332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phillip G. Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Wade Haynes, CCSO Corrections Officer, Jaime Andradt, CCSO Corrections Officer, Daniel Hayes, CCSO Corrections Officer and others
USA v. Davis
as 23-20207
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Scott Jackson Davis
Cavett v. Lumpkin
as 23-50314
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Holder
as 23-30278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffrey Scott Holder
Casey v. Middlebrooks
as 23-60207
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kendrick Lamont Casey
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Middlebrooks
von Falkenhorst v. Hunter
as 23-20154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rainer Eric Nikolaus Falkenhorst and Rainer von Falkenhorst, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Hunter, Cory Don Sepolio, Scott G. Hamilton and others
USA v. Scott
as 23-20151
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Marquese Machea Scott, also known as Fatboi
Scott v. Lumpkin
as 23-20142
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vashaun Scott
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Russell v. State of Texas
as 23-10363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Lynn Russell
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Texas Attorney General and John Scott, Attorney General, State of Texas, Texas Attorney General
Sullivan v. Feldman
as 23-20140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Scott Sullivan, Frank Dellacroce, St. Charles Surgical Hospital, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Stewart A. Feldman, Feldman Law Firm, L.L.P., Capstone Associated Services (Wyoming), Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeff Carlson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
