Cases 1 - 10 of 28
USA v. Thomas
as 23-30808
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Adrienne Gale Thomas, also known as Adrienne Ezernack
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-40361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Engeling
as 22-20285
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Toni Gale Engeling
Roberson v. Jackson
as 20-40798
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathan Gale, Amy Westbrook, Norris D. Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Cardora Roberson
USA v. Amanda Mangiapane
as 20-50519
Defendant / Appellant:
AMANDA GALE MANGIAPANE, also known as Amanda Gale Sharp
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Levonzel Anderson v. Management Training Corp., et al
as 20-60342
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT TRAINING CORPORATION, ("MTC"), Individual Capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN GABRIEL WALKER, Official Capacity and Individual Capacity, WARDEN JODY BRADLEY, Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEVONZEL ANDERSON
Gale Terry v. Acadiana Concern for Aids
as 19-30547
Defendant / Appellant:
ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF EDUCATION AND SUPPORT INCORPORATED, doing business as Acadiana C A R E S
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GALE E. TERRY
Gale Terry v. Acadiana Concern Aids Relief
as 19-90018
Not Yet Classified:
GALE E. TERRY and ACADIANA CONCERN FOR AIDS RELIEF EDUCATION AND SUPPORT, doing business as Acadiana C A R E S
Gale Walker v. Robert Smith
as 19-60313
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI and ROBERT SHULER SMITH, individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney of Hinds County, Mississippi
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GALE NELSON WALKER
Michael Roberson v. Norris Jackson, et al
as 19-40355
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA A. URKUSKI, Sergeant, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH MEDICAL UNIT, AMY WESTBROOK, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CARDORA ROBERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
