Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Tipton v. Rayford
as 24-50214
Plaintiff:
Charlton Reed Tipton
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Christopher Pauley, Captain, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Ruth E. Trice, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Garrison v. TDCJ
as 24-20097
Plaintiff:
William Scott Garrison
Defendant:
TDCJ Mail Grievance Department, Alfred Hughes Unit Grievance Department, Bambi Kiser, TDCJ Media Officer and others
Rivens-Baker v. Riley
as 24-50181
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Jessica Riley, Roger Boyd, Miriam Herrera, Captain and others
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10885
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Locke v. Rivera
as 23-40208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nelson A. Locke
Defendant / Appellee:
Augustin Rivera, Jr., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Teresa Ereon Giltner, in her official capacity as Vice Chairman of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Harold Odom, in his official capacity as Member of the Texas Board of Law Examiners and others
USA v. Stewart
as 23-30101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alfred Stewart, III
USA v. Gonzalez-Longoria
as 22-50947
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Leon Gonzalez-Longoria, also known as Alfred Martinez, also known as Juan Vela
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
