Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Spectrum WT v. Wendler
as 23-10994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Spectrum WT, Barrett Bright and Lauren Stovall
Defendant / Appellee:
Walter Wendler, Christopher Thomas, John Sharp and others
Not Classified By Court:
Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law First Amendment Clinic, Secular Student Alliance, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
as 23-50627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Free Speech Coalition, Incorporated, MG Premium, Limited, MG Freesites, Limited and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Angela Colmenero, Attorney General, State of Texas and Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Council on Pornography Reform, American Civil Liberties Union, America's Future and others
Mann v. Montgomery
as 23-30232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Original Mann, formerly known as Cyrus Casby
Defendant / Appellee:
Ann Montgomery, DNA Analyst, Bonnie Dubourg, DNA Analyst, Greg Harrell, DNA Analyst and others
Campaign Legal Center v. Scott
as 22-50692
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Campaign Legal Center, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Texas, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John B. Scott, in his official capacity as Secretary of the State of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Franciscan Alliance v. Becerra
as 21-11174
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Franciscan Alliance, Incorporated, Christian Medical and Dental Society and Specialty Physicians of Illinois, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and River City Gender Alliance
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al v. Alex Azar, II, Secretary, et al
as 20-10093
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED, CHRISTIAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SOCIETY and SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF ILLINOIS, L.L.C.
Intervenor / Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF TEXAS and RIVER CITY GENDER ALLIANCE
Dennis Hopkins, et al v. Delbert Hosemann
as 19-60678
Not Yet Classified:
EARNEST WILLHITE, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HERMAN PARKER, JR., individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, BYRON DEMOND COLEMAN, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated and others
Not Classified By Court:
DKT LIBERTY PROJECT, AMERICAN PROBATION AND PAROLE ASSOCIATION, CATO INSTITUTE and others
Franciscan Alliance, Inc., et al v. Norris Cochran, Acting Secy, et al
as 17-10135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE, INCORPORATED, CHRISTIAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SOCIETY, SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS OF ILLINOIS, L.L.C. and others
Movant - Appellant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF TEXAS and RIVER CITY GENDER ALLIANCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
