Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jeffrey Davis v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 20-60465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY K. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, An Agency of the United States of America, THOMAS WIGHT, METROPOLITAN SECURITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, doing business as Walden Security and others
Rebecca Gallogly v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 19-50044
Defendant / Appellee:
2013 TRAVIS HEIGHTS L.P., CAPITAL AREA PRIVATE DEFENDER SERVICE, DOMINIUM APARTMENTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA H. GALLOGLY
Son Nguyen v. Attorney General of the USA, et al
as 17-10295
Petitioner - Appellant:
SON VINH NGUYEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-11165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ruben Ortega, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-50629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN DARIO ORTEGA, Individually and as Next Friends of A.O., a minor child and NANCY ORTEGA, Individually and as Next Friends of A.O., a minor child
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JANET NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as the current Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his capacity as the former Secretary of Department of Homeland Security and others
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 11-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the US, et al
as 10-20558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
