Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Ortega v. Off of the Comp of the Curcy
as 23-60617
Petitioner: Saul Ortega, Former Chief Financial Officer, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board and David Rogers, Jr., Former Chairman of the Board
Respondent: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Alvarez v. Danheim
as 23-40162
Plaintiff / Appellant: Martin Alvarez, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee: James Danheim, Henry Adams, FNU Alexander, Sergeant and others
Saul Ortega, et al v. Off of the Compt of the Curcy
as 20-60590
Respondent: OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY
Petitioner: DAVID ROGERS, JR., Former Chairman of the Board and SAUL ORTEGA, Former Chief Financial Officer, Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board
Gregory Halprin v. FDIC
as 16-51290
Defendant / Appellee: Dan Brown, Individually and in his former capacty with Land America Lawyers Title, Robert Gandy, David Rogers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Paul Weber, Gregory Halprin, Andrew Nguyen and others
Gregory Halprin, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 16-51290
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY HALPRIN, LES KLINGERMAN, PAUL WEBER and others
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver for First National Bank (the "FDIC"), also known as First National Bank, MIKE MALDONADO, in his official capacity with First National Bank, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, formerly known as LandAmerica Lawyers Title of San Antonio and others
USA v. David Allen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-50283
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID ROGER ALLEN
Rogers, et al v. Hooper, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-40809
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID ROGERS and KATHRYN ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee: MATT HOOPER, MIKE TAYLOR, JACE ANGLIN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?