Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Esparza-Rodriguez
as 23-10973
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edgar Alonso Esparza-Rodriguez
Eubanks v. Nelson
as 23-10936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Travis Wayne Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Travis Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Kyle Strongin, a voter of Hood County, Texas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Nelson, Texas Secretary of State, John B. Scott, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State and others
Appellant:
Anne Stone and Allyson Raskin
Miller v. Doe
as 23-50537
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Miller, Scott Copeland, Laura Palmer and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John or Jane Doe, in his or her official capacity as the Secretary of State of the State of Texas and Jose A. Esparza, in his official capacity as the Deputy Secretary of the State of Texas
Esparza v. Lumpkin
as 23-20286
Petitioner / Appellant:
Eric Esparza
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
USA v. Sanchez-Esparza
as 22-40716
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Armando Sanchez-Esparza, also known as Armando Sanchez Esparza
Abrego-Esparza v. Garland
as 22-60181
Petitioner:
Briselda Abrego-Esparza
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Patrick v. Herbst
as 22-40150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John T. Patrick
Defendant / Appellee:
Jennifer Hirbst, Ray A. Guevara, Francisco Olvera, Jr. and others
Flores-Esparza v. Garland
as 22-60041
Petitioner:
Monica Lucila Flores-Esparza
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
