Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Waldrup v. Henderson
as 24-20273
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lee Waldrup
Defendant:
Rand Henderson, Sheriff of Montgomery County, Paul Damico, Magistrate Judge, Modesto Rosales, Assistant District Attorney and others
Woodlands Pride v. Paxton
as 23-20480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Woodlands Pride, Incorporated, Abilene Pride Alliance, Extragrams, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren Kenneth Paxton, In an official capacity as Attorney General of Texas, Brett Ligon, in an official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Montgomery County, Texas and others
Ligon v. CELINK
as 22-20441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jackie Ligon, as personal representative of the Estate of Murlene Bowman
Defendant / Appellee:
CELINK, Compu-Link, doing business as CELINK, McCarthy & Holthus, L.L.P. and others
Herman Hoffman, et al v. Gordon Welch, et al
as 19-20515
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD CHIN, MICHAEL SEILER, GORDON WELCH, In his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHLEEN HOFFMAN and HERMAN HOFFMAN
Brian Ortiz v. Montgomery County, Texas, et al
as 18-20323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, BRETT LIGON, PHIL GRANT and others
Nikita Goffney v. Martha Koomer, et al
as 15-20166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKITA VAN GOFFNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA D. KOOMER, Deputy Court Reporter, CASSANDRA MCCOY, Deputy Court Reporter, MICHAEL T. SEILER, District Court Judge and others
Jack Ligon v. Ray LaHood
as 10-11297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK W LIGON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY LAHOOD, U S Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration
John Warden v. Ligon
as 09-10985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LIGON, Dr.
Jack Ligon v. Ray LaHood
as 09-10860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK W LIGON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY LAHOOD, U S Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
