Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Castaneda v. State of Nevada
as 24-50328
Plaintiff:
Rudy Castaneda
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Does 1-5, Inclusive, Joni Abraham and others
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae:
Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Richard DeOtte, et al v. Alex Azar
as 19-10754
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HOTZE HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, JOHN KELLEY, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, YVETTE DEOTTE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA
Jackson Women's Hlth Org v. Dobbs
as 19-60455
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACKSON WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on behalf of itself and its patients and SACHEEN CARR-ELLIS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH CLEVELAND, M.D., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health
Amicus Curiae:
Roman Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi, Roman Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, Mississippi, Information Society Project at Yale Law School and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Frederick Silver v. Candice Towner, et al
as 18-50158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. SILVER
Defendant - Appellee:
CANDICE KATIE TOWNER, SARAH NELSON, TRINA GOMEZ and others
State of Nevada, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 17-41130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARY ZIEGLER, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Policy of the Wage and Hour Division and others
Movant - Appellant:
TEXAS AFL-CIO
In re: State of Texas
as 17-60191
Petitioner:
STATE OF TEXAS
:
STATE OF NEVADA, NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, ENERGY NORTHWEST and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, JAMES RICHARD PERRY, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, in his official capacity and others
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
