Cases 31 - 40 of 7,729
Francis v. Quachita Parish Corrections, et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Henry Ray Francis
Defendant:
Quachita Parish Corrections, Unidentified Parties, Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. William et al
as 2:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Tomarcus Porter
Defendant:
Jason William, Lance Wallance, Beau Bowmen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. USA
as 2:2024cv00910
Petitioner:
Quincy White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Anderson v. Day
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Donald Arthur Anderson
Defendant:
Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. University of New Orleans Hospital
as 2:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Coty Robert Rainey
Defendant:
University of New Orleans Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moncrief v. Public Defender's Office
as 2:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Damien Rashad Moncrief
Defendant:
Public Defender's Office, Craig King, Anna Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Webre et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Quentin Williams
Defendant:
Craig Webre, Stan Cowley, Juluette Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
