Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Kemp v. Shreveport Police Dept et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Kemp
Defendant:
Shreveport Police Dept, Pierce, Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Moore et al
as 1:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
Keith Mark Dillon
Defendant:
Lance Moore, Linus Wilkerson, Ben Otwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Probation & Parole et al
as 5:2016cv01686
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Parks, Sr
Defendant:
Probation & Parole and Lenord Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourgeois v. Valero Energy Corp, et al
as 6:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Brenda Fontenot Bourgeois
Defendant:
Valero Energy Corp , Desiree N Bourgeois , Hannah R Bourgeois and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Samuels v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv02576
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Victor E Jones, Jr, Leonard Pierce, William Tuggle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01387
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Development Center Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01418
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Pierce and Pam Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Pierce v. Pfizer Inc
as 3:2014cv00436
Plaintiff:
Brenda J Pierce
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. City of Alexandria et al
as 1:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
LaRunda Hobbs Pierce
Defendant:
City of Alexandria , Terence Grines , Ricky Rachal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
