Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Taylor v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Corrections Corp of America, Keith, V Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McDonald et al
as 3:2013cv02936
Plaintiff:
Bryant Darnell Davis
Defendant:
McDonald, Patrick, District Attorney Morehouse Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shivers v. Lard et al
as 1:2013cv02406
Plaintiff:
Darren D Shivers
Defendant:
Lard, McDonald, Marlan Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Horne et al
as 1:2013cv02295
Plaintiff:
Edward Gene Morris
Defendant:
Pam Horne, King, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Samson Contour Energy E & P L L C
as 5:2013cv02212
Defendant:
Samson Contour Energy E & P L L C
Plaintiff:
Joe Lynn Robinson , Mark Alan Smith , Nelda Robinson Gremillion and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
McDonald Land Services Inc et al v. Chesapeake Louisiana L P et al
as 5:2013cv01815
Plaintiff:
McDonald Land Services Inc and Jon G Black L L C
Defendant:
Chesapeake Louisiana L P , Chesapeake Operating Inc and G S F L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
McDonald v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01754
Plaintiff:
Joanne McDonald
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDonald v. Federal Detention Center Oakdale
as 2:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
Pedro McDonald
Defendant:
Warden Federal Detention Center Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2012cv03055
Plaintiff:
Dominick Lavar Daniels
Defendant:
Godfrey, Thomas Lites, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
