Cases 111 - 120 of 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Lynda F. Gill and Laurie Rood
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. , Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Adcock
as 3:2017mc00282
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Stephen F. Adcock
Jones v. Kauerz et al
as 3:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Jones
Defendant:
Cassandra W. Kauerz, Great Southern National Bank , Law Firm of Glover, Young, Hammack Walton and Simmons, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Triplett v. Langston & Langston, PLLC et al
as 3:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Mae Triplett
Defendant:
Langston & Langston, PLLC , Shane F. Langston and John and/or Jane Does A, B and C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burgess v. Little et al
as 3:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Burgess
Defendant:
O. Little , R. Abangan , F. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conklin v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Richard Willis Conklin
Defendant:
F. Shaw and L. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. United Rentals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez and Selina Rodriguez
Defendant:
United Rentals, Inc. , United Rentals (North America), Inc. , Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McCombs v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Lisa J. McCombs
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc., Envoy Air, Inc. and John and Jane Does A, B, C, D, E, F, and G
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
