Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Patterson v. Dominion Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Amy I. Patterson
Defendant:
Dominion Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stanley et al v. American Tank & Vessel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
Darrell Stanley and Amy R. Stanley
Defendant:
American Tank & Vessel, Inc. , Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. and John and Jane Does A, B, C, and D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fox v. Hodgson et al
as 3:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
Carlos Dewayne Foxx
Defendant:
Amy Hodgson, Willie Roberts, Janie Birdtail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckley v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Amy G. Buckley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Mary L. Pippins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hendricks v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2013cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Andre Hendricks
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Unknown Giles, Unknown Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. 1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP
Defendant:
1.12 Acres in George County, Mississippi, Jo Ann Donald, OLA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Bridges v. Mack et al
as 3:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Broderick Rayon Bridges
Defendant:
Lawrence Mack, Tasheena Mann, Amy Schade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Regions Bank, N.A. v. Foster Automotive Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Foster Automotive Enterprises, LLC, Timothy Foster and Amy Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
