Cases 1 - 10 of 45,421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Silas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Elbert Silas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Randy Dale Jackson and Randy Dell Jackson
Defendant:
Commisioner Burl Cain and Jeffrey Belk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodland v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Deonte Woodland
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi, Sheriff Jeremy McCoy and Chief Deputy Kenny Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Maher v. Arroyo et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Greg Maher
Defendant:
Miguel Perez Arroyo and State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barnes v. Huffman
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Edward Barnes, III
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemon v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
William Day'Juan Lemon
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGraw v. Huffman
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGraw
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
