Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 22,864
Mosley v. UFN
as 9:2024cv00096
Plaintiff: Marion Ray Mosley
Defendant: ULN UFN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Monroe
as 6:2024cv00117
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Anderson
Defendant: Regional Director Carol Monroe and Carol Maroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff: Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant: John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff: Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant: John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00213
Petitioner: Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carr v. Morin et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Willie Ty'rone Carr
Defendant: Brad Morin and Michael Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. Captain Gipson et al
as 9:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Charles Harold Hughes
Defendant: Captain Gibson, Sgt Sykes and Office of the Attorney General - Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deases v. Mr. B. Cain et al Case transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: Estevan Deases
Respondent: Mr. B. Cain and M.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00093
Petitioner: Hendrick Darnell Jones
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: Derrick D. Fields
Defendant: Jeff Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?