Cases 21 - 30 of 735
Frankenfield v. Smith et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
FNU Smith and Unknown Others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. TDCJ et al
as 9:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
TDCJ and Securus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. B. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
B. Smith, H. Glover and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frankenfield v. TDCJ et al
as 9:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
TDCJ, Securus and Warden Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillory v. Beaumont Police Dept et al
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Conrell Guillory
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Dept, M Stutes and C Ratcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavett v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Scott Cavett
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Juan Garcia, C Eppeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Bowie County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Malcolm C Mack
Defendant:
Bowie County Detention Center, Kelly Chris, Judge John L Tidewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
