Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Evans v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Aaron Evans
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Lieutenant John Ellis, Sergeant Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Marshall
as 6:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Billy Butler
Respondent:
Asst. Warden Marshall and Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Warden Unknown Gracia, Warden Unknown Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmett v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Med Dir Ann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbert v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00102
Defendant:
Corey Wilbert and Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Warden Gracia, Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 1:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Matthew Steel, Cody McGallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Robinson et al
as 6:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Sergeant Unknown Robinson, Officer Unknown Sergent, Officer Unknown Naaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitts v. Lumpkin
as 9:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Fitts, Jr.
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
