Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
John Hopkins Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. East Texas Roof Works & Sheet Metal, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
John Hopkins Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
East Texas Roof Works & Sheet Metal, LLC and Jimmy D. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nutt v. Keystone RV Company
as 6:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordon Nutt
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gordon v. Morgan, et al.
as 4:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kendell Gordon
Defendant:
Brian Marquis Morgan and Z-Wil Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hall v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Hall
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adams v. Gordon et al
as 6:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Alex Adams
Defendant:
Athony Gordon, Central Grievance Office, Mike Ptasiensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Kuntz et al
as 1:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Shaw
Defendant:
FNU Kuntz, Laura Gordon and FNU Led
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00419
Petitioner:
Jeffery Wade Gordon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Lumpkin
as 6:2022cv00441
Petitioner:
Jeffery Wade Gordon
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
