Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Evans v. Abbott et al
as 3:2013cv01698
Petitioner:
Clyde Dale Evans
Respondent:
Greg Abbott and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Abbott et al
as 4:2013cv00375
Petitioner:
Clyde Dale Evans
Respondent:
Greg Abbott and Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillen v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Robert Clyde McMillen
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID, Michael L Phillips, James E Allen, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00210
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
McMillen v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00855
Petitioner:
Robert Clyde McMillen
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID's Safe Prisons Mandate, PLRA's 3 Strike Provisons, Estate of John Ross Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2011cv00104
Defendant:
State of Texas, Arnold Prill, Mark Raymond Riley and others
Plaintiff:
Irma Nell Cooper, Brian K Hubbard, Jennifer Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. F.B.O.P-Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dale Evans
Defendant:
F.B.O.P-Federal Bureau of Prison, United States of America, NFN Haufman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Midland Funding LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
Clyde E Randle
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC and McClesky, Harriger, Brazill & Graf LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Head v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
as 4:2010xc00020
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clyde Head
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
