Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Heim v. ARAMARK Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03494
Plaintiff: Tyrone Heim
Defendant: ARAMARK Services, Inc. , Occupational Safety Training Inc and ARAMARK U.S. Offshore Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hughes v. ARAMARK Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00326
Defendant: ARAMARK Corporation, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc, Transocean Drilling (U.S.A.) Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Glenda Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Erosa v. Aramark Corporation. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2012cv02157
Plaintiff: Miguel Vicente Erosa
Defendant: Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kyoumijran v. ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
as 4:2012cv01025
Plaintiff: Antranik Kyoumijran
Defendant: ARAMARK Facility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VU et al v. W&D Apparel (Jordan) Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00282
Plaintiff: THUY THI VU, Phuong-Anh Vu, BOAT PEOPLE SOS and others
Defendant: JAMES SHEN, LUONG NHU DUONG, VU THU HA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04471
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv04057
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv03999
Plaintiff: Alvin McDaniel
Defendant: Aramark Corporation and Ben Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00218
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?