Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Phillips v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00217
Petitioner:
Clifford Kenneth Phillips
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beck v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv02963
Petitioner:
Walter Clifford Beck
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glanville et al v. Dupar, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv02537
Plaintiff:
G. Bruce Glanville, Clifford Cook and Brent Wiggins
Defendant:
Dupar, Inc., Dupar Properties, Inc. and Kelly Parsons J.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fairfax v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2008cv02444
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jackson Fairfax
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Harold Hurtt and Refedo Madrid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Pfizer et al
as 4:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
Michael W Allen, James M Bass, II, Sheryl Battiest and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and GD Searle LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eiseman v Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals et al
as 4:2008cv00353
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Eiseman
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Segura v. MCC Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00501
Plaintiff:
Clifford Segura
Defendant:
MCC Transport, Inc., Union Pacific Railroad Company and Joseph Fitzgerald Backus
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Sanford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv02919
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Sanford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Smith v.Leonard, et al
as 3:2007cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Allen Smith
Defendant:
Gean Leonard, Michael Henson, R. C. DeLaCruz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
