Cases 31 - 40 of 923
Smith v. McDonough
as 5:2023cv01552
Defendant:
Michael Aretth Smith and Denis Richard McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. ESO Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Essie Jones, Essie McVay, Larry Claybo and others
Defendant:
ESO Solutions, Inc., Robert Day, George Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cacho v. DMB Financial, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
DMB Financial, LLC d/b/a American Debt Relief, a Massachusetts Limited Liability Company, Global Holdings LLC and ARNOLD & SMITH LAW, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooley et al v. Texas Custom Builder et al
as 6:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cooley, Joshua Bailey, Juan Guerrero and others
Defendant:
Texas Custom Builder, George Perry, JMI Contractors, LLC and others
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Irene Armendariz Perez
Defendant:
Warden Mr. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
