Cases 171 - 180 of 167,426
Martin v. USA
as 2:2024cv02219
Petitioner:
Sean Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Dickens vs. Unidentified Parties, et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dickens
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dickens et al v. Oakdale Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Colton Hebert, Daisy Solomon, Thomas Dickens and others
Defendant:
John Melbert and Oakdale Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Morales v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv01232
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Plaintiff:
Ramon Sanchez-Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lott v. River Bend Detention Center
as 3:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Shane Lott
Defendant:
Warden River Bend Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Federal Register
as 3:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stewart
Defendant:
Federal Register
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Andrews
as 3:2024cv00754
Defendant:
Andrea Michelle Andrews
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McRand v. Wingfield
as 3:2024cv00533
Defendant:
Warden Wingfield
Plaintiff:
William McRand
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. McCarty
as 3:2024cv00534
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Major Unknown McCarty
Plaintiff:
Dallas Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Weatherspoon v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00535
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Weatherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
