Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 167,509
Cato v. The Federal Government of the United States
as 1:2024cv01108
Defendant: The Federal Government of the United States
Plaintiff: Avery Cato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rowe v. ViaPath
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff: Marcus Lee Rowe
Defendant: ViaPath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. United States
as 1:2024cv01112
Plaintiff: Marcus Lee Rowe
Defendant: United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. City of Austin
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff: Marcus Lee Rowe
Defendant: City of Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maltlyio v. Travis County, State of Texas
as 1:2024cv01118
Defendant: Travis County, State of Texas
Plaintiff: Jamie Maltlyio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foret v. Tina et al
as 2:2024cv02243
Defendant: Mrs. Kelly, Mrs. Tina, Terrebonne Parish Jail and others
Plaintiff: Norris Joseph Foret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckley v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00766
Defendant: Stephen J. Windhorst, John J. Molaison, Jr. and Marc E. Johnson
Plaintiff: Daniel Lee Beckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Julien et al
as 3:2024cv00546
Defendant: MDOC, Denise Bone and Saint Julien
Plaintiff: Nicholas Beasley
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Defendant: Officer Unknown Williams, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Jacob Louis Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. USA
as 4:2024cv00877
Petitioner: Adrian Warren
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?