Cases 81 - 90 of 165,830
Turner v. Tegner et al
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Keiwayttan L Turner
Defendant:
Mrs Tegner, Terry Savage and Mike Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Travis Day, Andria Johnson, Rhonda Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malveaux v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Antonio Malveaux
Defendant:
Nolen Bass, A Johnson and Jarrod Bottley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bankhead v. Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2024cv01384
Petitioner:
Diandra Bankhead
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Roberson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Rayford Glenn Roberson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Ellis Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Busby v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Schmoker
as 4:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Wayne Schmoker and Executive Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 4:2024cv02142
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Ms. FNU Mosley, F/N/U Akinroabu, Sgt. Camille Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
