Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Smith et al v. JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC
as 4:2019cv00751
Plaintiff:
Nikole M. Smith and Shawn D. Smith
Defendant:
JPMC Specialty Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Bank NA v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00737
Plaintiff:
US Bank NA
Defendant:
Francis M Smith and May R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owen Smith, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 16-51010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN M. SMITH and DANA NORWOOD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, L.L.P., STEPHEN C. PORTER, G. TOMMY BASTIAN and others
Owen Smith, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 14-50256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN M. SMITH and DANA NORWOOD SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, L.L.P., STEPHEN C. PORTER and others
Smith et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 1:2013cv00193
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America Corporation, Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner and Engel, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Norwood Smith and Owen M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Smith et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2011cv02032
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association , BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Smith and Marilou M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. National City Mortgage et al
as 1:2009cv00881
Plaintiff:
Owen M. Smith and Dana N. Smith
Defendant:
National City Mortgage, Countrywide Bank, USA Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States of America v. Manuel et al
as 2:2009cv06488
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
Shawntell Manuel and Kristol M Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
