Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Graham v. United States Postal Service et al
as 7:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Roberta Graham
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Alvarez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Hilder Lainez Alvarez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Lewis et al v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Demetris Lewis and Steven Keys, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Smocks v United States of America The
as 4:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant:
United States of America The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Acosta v. Cervantes
as 3:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Yvette Acosta, Jorge M Acosta, Ingrid Saralhy Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Gustavo Cervantes, George O Pinedo, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Frizzell v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Brooke Frizzell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Retail Ready Career Center Inc v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv02204
Plaintiff:
Retail Ready Career Center Inc
Defendant:
United States of America and Miguel Coias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Randall v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
Antanita Randall
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Morgan v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Caroline Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tave v. Blakemore et al
as 4:2016cv00278
Plaintiff:
Amber Tave
Defendant:
Preston Blakemore , United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
